[drkn]

i hope for a refresh

[ Added: 2007-04-20, 01:40 ]
either the time for harder levels has come or we need a break...

[ Added: 2007-04-20, 02:28 ]
nevermind. it WAS easy >.<

[davenger]

Either the levels are becoming harder or it's me turning into an idiot
I tried listening to this notes, converted them to letters, no clue... And I don't get what the source hint is about.
Did I miss a hintscreen again?

[Marven]

You missed one 'simple' detail... that detail shows one and only way to the answer.

[davenger]

Where should i look for it?

[Marven]

Well... check EVERY element of this riddle, EVERY! Don't miss any detail, be sure, that EVERY element is right or not, because that detail is really hard to see <! but it's still a 'simple' detail >

Some music knowledge is quite useful here... <! I know, that it's obvious >

[arecek]

I think i know who is author of this xxx , and what is it (this xxx) name . But this give me nothing o.0 . How i should use it ? (name , tittle etc give me nothing)

[Beezqp]

Neither author nor title useful here... It's not about any song

[Tynka]

wrong track... use what you have on the picture

[arecek]

I tried use that what i see on picture . I translate it with --- and i got gliberish. I found smthk like language , but i can't find tranlator.

@edit : dont panic when you see gliberish

[Tynka]

check your... hmm... 'starting point'

[JaffaCake]

I'm just happy to be past 44

I'm guessing there is more than one useful 'detail' in this image?

[Beezqp]

Yes, but finding this detail is 3/4 of success

[Strati]

I haven't found - i think - this detail when i solved, and not after solving either...
But that's cause i have some musical knowledge and it wasn't that hard to figure
out what to do.

Just telling cause you don't need to worry if you can't find this detail that everyone talks about, it's solveable without it.

[Marven]

Yes, it is still solvable, but finding that detail you don't have to combine with that what you get

[JaffaCake]

well I'm glad that's clear now

[Beezqp]

If you know nothing about music - try comparing it with some... standard stuff. You need the detail.

If you have some knowledge - then you can do this "in your mind"

[JaffaCake]

everything I need to know about music + notes, my 'friend' can tell me? Or do I need real talent?

[Strati]

I don't know who is your friend, but talent isn't required, just basic knowledge.

[paFci0]

I think he mentioned uncle Google and maybe aunt W. as well.
Of course it can help.
But I can't imagine that you didn't have any Art/Music lessons in school

[pepez]

i used a * programme to draw all the n****, so now i know all the letters and the melody, ofcourse letters only go --- and melody doesnt make sense to me at all.. what to do?

[Tynka]

find another key for this riddle

[maniac]

Glad to solve 44, nice level.

45... All I need is the detail in the pic?

[paFci0]

And basic knowledge of music, yes

[maniac]

OK, so I got the name of the notes, but it's simply gibberish...

[Beezqp]

That's because you've missed the detail

[maniac]

What's the detail, then. You mean shift3?

[Beezqp]

Nah. Compare.

[maniac]

compare what... The distance of the notes?

[bna]

You need to compare... everything. It is hard to help without saying too much. You are very close. Tynka's hint above is very good. The answer is in plain site. When you get it, you will kick yourself.

[maniac]

but ---... ( in music? )