[drkn]

getting bored of me?

[DaWorm]

I know what the numbers are and I know what the numbers in parenthesis represent. I just cant find a connection between the first set of numbers. Am I looking for a single common connection? Or do I have to manipulate the first set of numbers somehow? I know the source clue is the key, but just not sure how. Could use a nudge.

[ode8]

manipulating to a single common connection and then looking for something more (it's easier this way, i think)

[Strati]

Hint Circle - 234°
Search, research and learn something. All info given straight on the level.

[legobenj]

The world is quiet here.

[L3v1athan]

hmm can`t figure out what the first set of numbers refers to. Any hint on how to manipulate them?

[legobenj]

Check out the numbers in the parenthesis first. Then the rest will come to you.

[Scoobiefield]

way too easy, i would recommend to make it harder somehow

[Monoris]

Scoobiefield remember, some riddles are unsolvable

[Beezqp]

and i thought i am kind making those riddles that easy...

[Strati]

Kind of stupid.

Sorry, couldn't resist. Nothing personal ;P

[Scoobiefield]

[khamenei]

This riddle reassures you - after so many trials and tribulations - that you CAN indeed solve a level completely by your own haha.

[OlgaZzZ]

Some numbers are misleading or "wrong" in this riddle.

[VisD]

They aren't wrong actually, they're just unclear...I was confused at a couple of them because of the font + background of wood = confusion!

[Muzozavr]

I'm hating this level right now. The idea seems clear, I know what I'm supposed to search for, the source hint is obvious... but the numbers on the left are... not precise enough, especially given some fairly conflicting sources that give me different numbers on a few of them.

I tried my best still... I've made a list of six "something"s. But now I don't know what to do with it... seeing as it SHOULD be something very obvious... it seems that my list is... wrong.

Any help on narrowing it down?

[maniac]

[Muzozavr]

Sorry, power of posting. I've *just* got this one on my own.

As a hint, I'll say that the last number on the left does NOT contain a dot.

As a second hint, some of those numbers are a tiny bit off, but googling will nonetheless allow you to pass.

This level is not stupid... a tiny bit unfair due to the imprecise numbers, yes... but not stupid... I am stupid.

[Rubix]

I haven't solved this one just yet (heading to bed now), but can anyone confirm that the first number (on the lefthand side) would be a little more precise if it were 1530.87 instead?

[Tynka]

i have 1530.87 in my notes
so, you are on the right track

[rwp80]

Do the numbers in the parentheses first.
The numbers on your left will frustrate you, they'll make your blood boil.
Then when you think you've got what you need, you need to lay them out on a table and listen.

[touchsky]

I feel a bit stupid with this one. I think I know the process and I have a nice neat outcome which looks plausible, but have no idea how this relates to what the answer may be.

I know it's already been confirmed that the first number is rounded and should actually have been .87, can somebody confirm if that is the case with the second number too? Because my nice, neat, rounded outcome is not so nice, neat or rounded due to the second number being slightly off.

[lla26]

[touchsky]

I could really do with PMing somebody with what I have just to check that I'm on the right track. I feel like I know what I should be doing but it doesn't lead me anywhere.

[lla26]

[touchsky]

My advice for anyone who may get stuck on this one is look at the brackets first, then use this to do the obvious conversion. Then once you have those converted numbers, be careful about which sources you use to decipher your answer from this. Some tables and charts gave me misleading information on the first two numbers.

[Brusto]

How to know which tables give false information? I'm stuck.

[lla26]